Lyft Is Launching a Fleet of Self-Driving Cars in San FranciscoDrive.aiSharesharetweetcommentemailAuthor: Alex DaviesAlex Davies09.07.1709:00 amLyft Is Launching a Fleet of Self-Driving Cars in San FranciscoDrive.aiIf Uber's scandals, lawsuits, and federal investigations haven’t already driven you into the backseat of its competition just yet, maybe this will: Lyft is launching a fleet of self-driving cars and select customers in the San Francisco Bay Area will be offered free rides in autonomous cars developed and operated by self-driving outfit Drive.ai. (With a human at the wheel for backup, per California law. And common sense.) Lyft and Drive.ai haven’t revealed certain key details about the pilot program—like when it will start (“soon”), how long it will run, how riders will be selected, or how the time of day, weather, and location will determine when to deploy the AV—but the new service provides an opportunity for Lyft to explore how it could fold this new way of moving into its existing service, and secure its place in the future of transportation. “We really want to understand, what are all the pieces that need to come into place?” says Taggart Matthiesen, Lyft’s product chief. For Drive.ai, a two-year-old self-driving startup, it's a chance to see test out its tech and see how real customers interact with its product. “We’re excited to utilize Lyft’s network of customers,” says Carol Reiley, Drive.ai’s co-founder and president. To start, the program will include about a dozen AVs (drawn from Drive.ai’s mixed fleet of Lincoln MKZ and Audi A4 sedans), but that number will grow as the company starts spending the $50 million it recently raised in a Series B funding round led by VC firm New Enterprise Associates. Both companies will collect data from customers (mostly through in-app reviews) about their experience, in the hopes of making sure they’re comfortable, or at least not terrified. Drive.ai isn't the first autonomous driving developer to start testing with real live customers. Uber started a pilot program in Pittsburgh last year, which it has since expanded to Tempe, Arizona. Google spinoff Waymo launched 100 self-driving Chrysler minivans in Phoenix in April. Nutonomy, a startup that spun out of MIT, is testing cars in Singapore, via a partnership with ride hailing company Grab. Last month, Cruise, a GM-owned company, launched a robo-taxi service in San Francisco for its own employees. Testing TestingAarian MarshallCongress Unites (Gasp) to Spread Self-Driving Cars Across America Jack StewartSelf-Driving Cars Are Confusing Drivers—And Spooking Insurers Alex DaviesSelf-Driving Cars Flock to Arizona, Land of Good Weather and No Rules Drive.ai also isn't the first autonomous driving developer to partner with Lyft. The company announced in January 2016 it would work with General Motors to develop self-driving cars. It also hooked up with Waymo and landed a $25 million investment, plus a fleet of cars for self-driving testing from Jaguar Land Rover. In June, the Uber rival partnered with Nutonomy. And in July, it revealed it is developing its own self-driving software and hardware. Missing out on the shift away from human drivers could easily cripple its future, so Lyft is likely wise to throw an egg into every basket it sees. “We don’t think a single provider is going to win here,” says Matthiesen. “We want to work with the best, and work their tech into our platform.” And for San Franciscans tired of their Lyft drivers missing turns and chatting too much, that may be good enough. Related VideoAutoMeet the Blind Man Who Convinced Google Its Self-Driving Car Is Finally ReadyGoogle is getting serious about self-driving cars. So serious that it put a legally blind man in one that drove him around safely on his own. The successful trip means that the tech giant can now launch its own self-driving car company, which it's calling Waymo. #Lyft#Self-Driving Cars#San FranciscoMost PopulartransportationA Delta Flight Beat Hurricane Irma Out of San Juan Airport, and It Was NBDAuthor: Aarian MarshallAarian MarshallscienceHurricane Irma: A Practically Impossible StormAuthor: Adam RogersAdam RogerssecurityHackers Gain Direct Access to US Power Grid ControlsAuthor: Andy GreenbergAndy GreenbergMore StoriesView CommentsSponsored StoriesPowered By OutbrainIssie LapowskyThousands of Facebook Ads Tied to Bogus Russian AccountsAarian MarshallCongress Unites (_Gasp_) to Spread Self-Driving Cars Across AmericaEmma Grey EllisJupiter's Auroras Defy the Laws of Earthly PhysicsAlex DaviesIndia Just Might Be Getting a HyperloopJulie Muncy*Absolver* Is a Stunning Fighting Game That Lacks PersonalityRhett AllainCan a Drone Carry a Full-Grown Human in a Hammock?More StoriesComedyAre Your Jokes Always Bombing? This App Crowdsources ThemAuthor: Chris WrightChris WrightRobotsA Brave Bomb-Disposal Robot You Control in Virtual RealityAuthor: Matt SimonMatt SimonMoviesCurrent War Trailer: Benedict Cumberbatch Is Thomas EdisonAuthor: Angela WatercutterAngela WatercuttersmartphonesCan Wonder Finally Build the Perfect Phone for Gamers?Author: David PierceDavid PierceProduct ReviewGarmin's Fenix 5X Wins the Multi-Sport Smartwatch MeleeAuthor: Brent RoseBrent RoseClimateHurricane Irma: A Practically Impossible StormAuthor: Adam RogersAdam RogersWe RecommendPowered By OutbrainDavid PierceHow Apple Finally Made Siri Sound More HumanIssie LapowskyThe DNC’s Technology Chief is Phishing His Staff. Good.Nitasha TikuNew America Chair Says Google Didn't Prompt Critic's OusterAarian MarshallThat Delta Plane Flying Straight Through Hurricane Irma Was NBDTom SimoniteWhy John Deere Just Spent $305 Million on a Lettuce-Farming RobotGet Our NewsletterWIRED’s biggest stories delivered to your inbox.submitLoginSubscribeAdvertiseSite MapPress CenterFAQAccessibility HelpCustomer CareContact UsSecuredropT-Shirt CollectionNewsletterWired StaffJobsRSSCNMN Collection Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our user agreement (effective 3/21/12) and privacy policy (effective 3/21/12). Affiliate link policy. Your California privacy rights. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Condé Nast.